Legal Opinion
Jones v. Hartranft
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1997No. 1995-2497PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 368.] JONES, APPELLEE, V. HARTRANFT ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Jones v. Hartranft,
1997-Ohio-203.] Civil procedure—Trial court does not abuse its discretion in dismissing a claim with prejudice under Civ.R. 41(B)(1), when. (No. 95-2497—Submitted January 22, 1997—Decided May 14, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APE02-139. __________________ A trial court does not abuse its discretion in dismissing a claim with prejudice under Civ.R.41(B)(1) when a plaintiff, who has had an objectively…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Jones v. HartranftOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Toney v. BerkemerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ocran v. RichlakOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Brown v. Bowers, C-070797 (8-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Harden v. Dayton, 22072 (3-28-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Clay v. Lakeview Farms, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Jones v. All Tune & LubeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.