Legal Opinion

Cussans v. Harris

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1982No. Docket 55201PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtK. B. Glaser, J.

The trial court granted accelerated judgment, pursuant, to GCR 1963, 116.1(5), in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

This is a dramshop action arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on October 3, 1976. In his complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendant Roy B. Harris, doing business as The Shanty (hereinafter referred to as "defendant bar”), illegally furnished intoxicating liquor to defendant Mangett, the alleged intoxicated person (AIP), while the latter was visibly intoxicated, that as a proximate result of the illegal sale Mangett was involved in an automobile…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Holland v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Lambert v. CalhounMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Buxton v. AlexanderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Jones v. BourrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
  3. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API