Buxton v. Alexander
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.
The issue here is whether, when an intoxicated defendant executed a settlement and indemnity agreement with the injured plaintiffs, the 1972 "name and retain” amendment to the dramshop statute precludes further claim against a tavern owner.
The facts are that on July 12, 1972, while a pedestrian in a parking lot in Mancelona, plaintiff, Roger Buxton, was struck by a car operated by defendant Loretta Alexander, and owned by her and her husband, defendant James Alexander.
On November 7, 1973, plaintiff and his wife started suit, claiming defendant, Loretta Alexander, drove negligently causing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Salas v. ClementsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Jawad a Shah Md Pc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- People v DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.