Legal Opinion

Buxton v. Alexander

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1976No. Docket 25942PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.

The issue here is whether, when an intoxicated defendant executed a settlement and indemnity agreement with the injured plaintiffs, the 1972 "name and retain” amendment to the dramshop statute precludes further claim against a tavern owner.

The facts are that on July 12, 1972, while a pedestrian in a parking lot in Mancelona, plaintiff, Roger Buxton, was struck by a car operated by defendant Loretta Alexander, and owned by her and her husband, defendant James Alexander.

On November 7, 1973, plaintiff and his wife started suit, claiming defendant, Loretta Alexander, drove negligently causing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Jawad a Shah Md Pc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API