Legal Opinion

Lundstrom v. Young

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 27, 2022No. 3:18-cv-02856Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN LUNDSTROM, Case No.: 18-cv-2856-GPC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; 14 CARLA YOUNG, an individual; GRANTING DEFENDANT LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; 15 YOUNG’S MOTION TO SEAL LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 16 401(k) PLAN; and DOES 1 through 20, [ECF Nos. 97, 100, 112] 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court are Defendant Carla Young’s (“Young”) Motion to Dismiss the 20 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), (ECF No. 97), and Defendants Ligand 21…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API