Legal Opinion

Fuss v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1958No. Civ. 22562PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order quashing service of summons upon J. A. Thompson and Son, Inc., a corporation.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff Edith K. Fuss on August 4, 1954. The original complaint was filed on August 3, 1955, and named as defendants therein the city of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, J. A. Thompson and Son, Contractors, a copartnership, J. A. Thompson, J. H. Thompson and a number of fictitiously named corporations, copartnerships and individuals. A first amended complaint was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Armstrong v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Billings v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Kline v. BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Sousa v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API