Legal Opinion

Carey v. Foster

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 12, 1963No. Civ. A. 853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.

The narrow issue for consideration may be stated as follows:

Under Virginia law may a wife recover in an action, where her husband has been negligently injured by a third party, for loss to the wife of the services and companionship of the husband occasioned by the injuries?

As this action was originally maintained Richard J. Carey and Virginia F. Carey, husband and wife, filed a complaint to recover damages for their respective personal injuries, with each of said parties claiming loss of consortium as an element of damage. They were both injured on September 1,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Seagraves v. LeggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Virginia F. Carey v. Cecil R. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  3. Benjamin v. Cleburne Truck & Body Sales, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1976
  4. Gainar v. SS Longview VictoryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1964
  5. Pringle v. SloanNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API