Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Andrews

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1982No. Civ. 10151PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Is “stacking” prohibited under the mandatory uninsured motorist statute in North Dakota? The trial court said it is not and we agree.

Is “stacking” of basic no-fault benefits prohibited under the North Dakota Auto Accident Reparations Act? The trial court said it is not. We do not agree.

Are provisions in an insurance policy which clearly prohibit “stacking” of uninsured motorist coverage enforceable in this state? We conclude that even though insurance policies are contracts of adhesion and the benefit of all doubts is given to the insured, the policy here leaves no doubt.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Burcham v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Mills v. Agrichemical Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SturrockTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. StamperWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Houser v. GilbertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Estate of GabelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API