Legal Opinion

Brubaker v. Brubaker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1906No. 14,519PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Pottawatomie district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*221The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

On December 24, 1901, a ceremony was performed purporting to unite in matrimony Andrew J. Brubaker and Melissa VanAikin, who thereafter for some six months lived together as man and wife. No legal union in fact was accomplished, for the rea-' son that the woman was already married. During their cohabitation Brubaker, conveyed various tracts of real estate to Mrs. Van Aikin. In July, 1902, he brought a suit against her and others claiming under her to set aside such conveyances upon the ground that they were executed because he believed her to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Golden Fleece G. & S. M. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Clement, Bane & Co. v. HartzellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Jenkins v. KirtleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Muskogee Refining Co. v. Waters Pierce Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. First Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Dolan Mercantile Co. v. Wholesale Grocery SubscribersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Arnall v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. In Re Estate of LowryOhio Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API