Marshall v. Golden Fleece G. & S. M. Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Washoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. The court erred in granting a new trial. 'No affidavit or statement was filed within five days filter the filing of the notice-for a new trial; and the time to file the statement not having been extended by the court or the plaintiffs, the right to move for a new trial was waived. (Sec. 197, 1 Com.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Washoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. The court erred in granting a new trial. 'No affidavit or statement was filed within five days filter the filing of the notice-for a new trial; and the time to file the statement not having been extended by the court or the plaintiffs, the right to move for a new trial was waived. (Sec. 197, 1 Com. Laws, 348; Easterby v. Larco, 24 Cal. 179; Leroy v. Ltassett, 32 Id. 171; Campbell v. Jones, 41 Id. 515; Killip v. Empire Mill Co., 2 Nev. 34; State v. First National Bank of…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Leonard, C. J.:
It is alleged in the complaint, herein, as follows:
The Golden Fleece company, one of the defendants, is, and since January, 1874, has been, a corporation duly incorporated and doing business under the laws of this state, haYing a capital stock of thirty thousand shares, of the nominal value of ten dollars each. ■ It owns and was incorporated for the purpose of working and developing a certain mine in Washoe county, known as the “ Golden Fleece mine.”
Since about December 1, 1875, the corporate powers of said corporation have been exercised by a. board of trustees,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Martin v. MatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Calderwood v. PeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Quivey v. GambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grand Central Min. Co. v. Mammoth Min. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
- Brubaker v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Comstock Mill & Mining Co. v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1892
- Nevada Mining & Eploration Co. v. RaeNevada Supreme Court · 1923
- Bond v. ThrustonNevada Supreme Court · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.