Legal Opinion

Muskogee Refining Co. v. Waters Pierce Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1923No. 10479PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in the superior court of Muskogee county by the Muskogee Refining Company against the Waters Pierce Oil Company and the Pierce Oil Corporation to reform a written contract entered into between the Muskogee Refining Company and the Pierce-Fordyee Oil Association, and by the Pierce-Fordyce Oil Association assigned to the Waters Pierce Oil Company, and by the latter company assigned to the Pierce Oil Corporation, and to recover judgment for money due under the contract after the same was reformed.

The Muskogee Refining Company by the terms of said contract agreed to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New Mexico Ex Rel. E. J. McLean & Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Mendota Club v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Roach v. Junction Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Hope v. BourlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Martin's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Wilson v. OlsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Bush v. BushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Barrows v. AlfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Loveland v. LoafmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API