Legal Opinion
Plate v. Sun-Diamond Growers
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1990No. A044137PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STRANKMAN, J.
The subject of this appeal is the application of Corporations Code section 317, subdivision (e)(4), 1 providing for court-ordered indemnification of an agent of a corporation against any judgment arising from the agent’s performance of his or her corporate duties. By this action, plaintiffs, H. R. Plate and H. R. Plate & Company, Inc. (Plate), sought damages for breach of contract and unfair competition against appellant, Sun-Diamond Growers of California (Sun-Diamond), a corporation, and Robert McElroy and Richard Branson (respondents here), who were former employees of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fed-Mart Corp. v. Pell Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,273 George S. McLean v. International Harvester Company, (Now Known as Navistar International Company)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Olivet v. FrischlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Petty v. Bank of New Mexico Holding Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Barnett v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Branson v. SUN-DIAMOND GROWERS OF CA.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Wilshire-Doheny Associates, Ltd. v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- August Entertainment, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.