Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance Company v. Peyson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1963No. 16462PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANGDON, Justice.

Suit was instituted by appellee to set aside the final order of the Industrial Accident Board. Trial was by jury. Verdict was returned finding appellee totally and permanently disabled. The six points of error are based upon jury argument and exclusion of impeachment testimony.

Affirmed.

In his opening argument appellee stated that Dr. Pace had testified that appellee was totally and permanently disabled. Appellant contends this was outside the record. In response to the objection the court in effect stated that he was not going to rule that the doctor said that because he did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Condra Funeral Home v. RollinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. RubushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Texas General Indemnity Company v. BridwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glenn v. GidelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Dallas Oil & Gas, Inc. v. MouerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Duke v. Power Electric & Hardware Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  5. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API