Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Ragland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 18, 1983No. 83-48PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This case involves the attempted imposition of a use tax by the State of Arkansas on eighty-six railroad freight cars newly acquired by lease or purchase by the Burlington Northern and Kansas City Southern Railway Companies, and loaded for the first time in Arkansas with cargo destined for delivery outside the state. The court below found the tax valid and appellants challenge that holding as a violation of the commerce clause of the United States Constitution. On appeal, we reverse.

The Arkansas Compensating Tax Act of 1949 was enacted to compensate for sales taxes lost…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Trucking Ass'n v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Director of Revenue v. Superior Aircraft Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Martin v. Riverside Furniture Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Pledger V. Brunner & Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. American Trucking Ass'n v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API