Legal Opinion

Martin v. Riverside Furniture Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1987No. 86-273PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal challenges a use tax imposed on advertising materials. Riverside Furniture Corporation is an Arkansas corporation, located in Fort Smith, which manufactures furniture for sale throughout the United States. An audit was conducted of Riverside’s records and books by the Department of Finance and Administration for the period of 1979-1982. The auditor found invoices for advertising materials, catalog inserts, photographs, and ad slicks. These materials were purchased from out-of-state companies for Riverside to distribute to its sales representatives and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Arkansas Beverage Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. American Television Co., Inc. v. HerveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Ragland v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Inter-State Nurseries, Inc. v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weiss v. Chem-Fab Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Pledger v. Noritsu America Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Alcoa World Alumina, L.L.C. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Lady Frances V, LLC v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API