Legal Opinion

State v. Harvey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 30, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

151 N.J. 117 (1997)

699 A.2d 596

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NATHANIEL HARVEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 29, 1996.

Decided July 30, 1997.

Michael B. Jones and Stephen A. Caruso, Assistant Deputies Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Susan L. Reisner, Public Defender, attorney).

Nancy A. Hulett, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

Defendant, Nathaniel Harvey, appeals directly from a judgment of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited173 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API