Legal Opinion

In the Interest of T.R.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 2005No. 05-0178PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Chief Justice.

Mother appeals a child-in-need-of-assistance permanency order that changed custody and directed the county attorney to file a petition to terminate the mother’s parental rights. The State moved to dismiss the appeal, alleging that the underlying order was not a final appealable order and grounds for permitting an interlocutory appeal had not been proven. Because we agree with the State, we grant its motion to dismiss the appeal.

I. Background Facts.

T.R., the subject of this appeal, was born October 1, 1995. His mother, Laura, is thirty-six years old. His father, David,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. IBP, Inc. v. Al-GharibSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. In the Interest of C.M.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Johnson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Bennett v. Ida CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. In the Interest of C.S.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In the Interest of L.T., A.T., and D.T., Minor ChildrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API