Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2016No. 11-FS-1217, 11-FS-1218, 11-FS-1255, 11-FS-1256, 11-FS-1257, 11-FS-1258, 11-FS-1259 & 11-FS-1260Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Glickman, Associate Judge,

with whom Fisher and McLeese, Associate Judges, join in full, and Thompson, Associate Judge, joins in Parts III and IV, concurring and dissenting:

This contested adoption case concerns the fate of two grievously neglected children. The sole question actually presented on appeal is a narrow one: whether the trial court properly considered psychological attachment evidence regarding how these children would be harmed if removed from their foster parents. Somehow, though, in the course of prolonged appellate gestation, the case has been transformed into a judicial…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API