Legal Opinion

IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2016No. 11-FS-1217, 11-FS-1218, 11-FS-1255, 11-FS-1256, 11-FS-1257, 11-FS-1258, 11-FS-1259 & 11-FS-1260Published

1Opinion of the Court

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Nos. 11-FS-1217, 11-FS-1218, 11-FS-1255, 11-FS-1256, DEC - 8 2016 11-FS-1257, 11-FS-1258, 11-FS-1259 & 11-FS-1260 IN RE TA.L.; IN RE A.L.; IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W.; IN RE PETITION OF E.A.; ADA-115-09; A.H. AND T.L. ADA-116-09; Appellants, NEG-235-08; ADA-172-09; ADA-173-09 On Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia BEFORE: WASHINGTON, Chief Judge; GLICKMAN, FISHER, BLACKBURNE- RIGSBY, THOMPSON, BECKWITH, EASTERLY, and MCLEESE, Associate Judges; and REID, Senior Judge. JUDGMENT This case came to be heard on the transcript of record and…

2Cases cited109 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API