Legal Opinion
Metzger v. Ætna Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 19, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
In these actions to recover on policies of fire insurance tried together, verdicts for the defendants were directed.
At the time of the issuance of the policies, the Kingston Chemical Manufacturing Co., Inc. (since become bankrupt), was engaged in erecting a building to be used as a manufacturing plant. The contract for the building was let in May, 1916, and the building was completed in the latter part of July or early in August. The first policy of insurance issued was dated June 9, 1916. It covered the building in process of erection and contained a builder’s risk clause. As this policy is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Trustees of the First Baptist Ch. v. . Brooklyn Fire Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 1859
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Hubbs & Hastings Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Grannis v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Savings and Loan Ass'n v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Anglin v. KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Metzger v. Ætna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Kosolapov v. Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- First Savings and Loan Ass'n v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971