Legal Opinion
Willig v. Gold
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1946No. Civ. 13122PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
The appellant, Willig, had been the owner of a business in San Francisco which he wanted to sell. Respondent Gold learned of this and negotiated with Willig to buy the business for himself. These negotiations having failed he undertook to secure a purchaser and succeeded in selling the business to a corporation for over $100,000. Gold demanded a much larger commission but was paid by Willig for his services as broker $3,000.
During the course of their negotiations Willig had disclosed to Gold the volume of his business over a certain period. Willig was insured by Rathbone, King & Seeley with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Irwin v. . CurieNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Lester v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Charles R. Lachman v. Sperry-Sun Well Surveying Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- ITT Telecom Products Corp. v. DooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- ITT Telecom Products Corp. v. DooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989