Legal Opinion
Dillard v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 2005No. 04CA0680PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCasebolt, J.
Debra Dillard (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) determining that her claim for temporary and permanent partial disability payments against her employer, Pepsi Bottling Group, is subject to the $60,000 benefit cap in § 8-42-107.5, C.R.S.2004. We affirm.
Claimant suffered an admitted work-related injury to her neck when she slipped and fell on ice in front of employer’s building. She underwent two surgeries to her cervical spine and received treatment for depression resulting in part from the chronic pain she suffered after the injury. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Davison v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Mountain City Meat Co. v. OquedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Carruthers v. Carrier Access Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dillard v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Steward Software Co. v. KopchoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- City of Loveland Police Department v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Leewaye v. IND. CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.