Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Krogh

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The appellant is satisfied with the trial court’s findings on the accounting issue excepting for the allowance of $4,000 for Krogh’s supervisory services which he contends was arrived at by speculation. In making this finding, the trial court considered the estimated 1,428 hours spent by Krogh (during part of this time he was paid as an employee of Nor cor), the nature of the work, and Fuller’s expectation that Krogh would be paid for such work. Henkelmann testified supervisory work of this nature was worth $3.65 an hour. Fuller testified Krogh put in a considerable amount of time in excess…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Luther v. C. J. Luther Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Dousman v. Wisconsin & Lake Superior Mining & Smelting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Steven v. Hale-Haas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Dunn v. Acme Auto & Garage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moteberg v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. McCroden v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Browning v. C & C PLYWOOD CORP.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Browning v. C & C PLYWOOD CORP.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. McCroden v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API