Legal Opinion

Ball v. Prentice

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 28, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 89-0049PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

Gerad L. Ball appeals from adverse par; tial summary judgments on his negligence claim against William Prentice and the Estate of Jane Prentice, deceased. The trial court ruled he had no claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and that he either had no claim for punitive damages or he had not made a sufficient showing on the issue of punitive damages to entitle him to pretrial discovery of Prentice’s assets.

We reverse the judgments and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

While Gerad L. Ball was driving his truck within the speed limit on a preferred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Keck v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Volz v. Coleman Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Valley National Bank v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kraszewski v. Baptist Medical Center of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Morton v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Arpaio v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API