Legal Opinion

Volz v. Coleman Co., Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1987No. CV 86-0321-PRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

This is a petition for review, filed by The Coleman Co., Inc. (Coleman), of an opinion of the court of appeals which affirmed a trial court judgment and award in favor of the respondents Sharon Volz and Valley National Bank, co-conservators for the plaintiff, Shannon Haddix. Volz v. The Coleman Co., Inc., 155 Ariz. 563, 748 P.2d 1187 [1986]. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23, 17A A.R.S.

II. QUESTION PRESENTED

We granted the petition for review to consider whether punitive damages were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Thomas v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Seyler v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API