Legal Opinion

United States v. Advincula

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 19, 1989No. ACM S28121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEONARD, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of one conspiracy offense and three offenses of violating a lawful general regulation. The offenses all involve some aspect of acquiring tax-exempt property in the Republic of the Philippines for the purpose of disposing of the property to Philippine nationals not entitled to tax-exempt privileges. Appellant pleaded guilty to all four offenses and during the providency inquiry the defense of duress was raised. We reverse because the military judge did not properly resolve the inconsistency between appellant’s pleas and the defense of duress.

Before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. JemmingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. TimminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. EvansU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. KroopU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. MarcyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. EllerbeeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. McQuinnNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API