Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Klee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1900No. 18,737PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Erom the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBakeb, J.

In Indianapolis appellant maintains a line of railroad in Georgia street. Helen street runs north and south and crosses Georgia street at' right angles. On June 22, 1894, at this crossing, appellee, a boy nine years of age at the time of the injury, was struck by appellant’s switch-engine. This action was begun on Deeemer 11, 1895, in the Marion Superior Court, and the venue was changed to the Hancock Circuit Court. The complaint is in six paragraphs, the last charging a wilful injury and the others counting on negligence. Appellant’s demurrer to each of the first five paragraphs for want of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BreadowTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Meredith v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. BolinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API