Legal Opinion

A. Buxton v. OAG

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 2020No. 253 C.D. 2020Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Andy Buxton, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 253 C.D. 2020 : SUBMITTED: August 7, 2020 Office of Attorney General, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER, Judge HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WOJCIK, Judge HONORABLE ELLEN CEISLER, Judge OPINION NOT REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION BY JUDGE CEISLER FILED: October 21, 2020 Andy Buxton (Buxton), pro se, petitions this Court for review of the February 21, 2020 Final Determination of the Appeals Officer (Appeals Officer) for the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General (OAG), who denied Buxton’s request for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Moore v. OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. PA State Police, Aplt. v. Grove, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Barros v. MartinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API