Legal Opinion
United States v. Sik Sze Yan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1989No. 88 Cr. 650 (CSH)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
In a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated December 19,1988, 704 F.Supp. 1203, familiarity with which is assumed, I considered a motion by defendant Yan to suppress evidence obtained as a result of what he contends was an illegal search of his apartment. Given the nature of the evidence seized, co-defendant Wong is also interested in the outcome of that motion, although he lacks standing to make it.
My prior opinion directed counsel to submit supplemental briefs on a particular issue. Opinion at 1207. Helpful additional submissions have been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- United States v. BurnsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. TaftDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- United States v. ShlaterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.