Legal Opinion

State v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1900No. Nos. 12,021-(13)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Defendant was indicted in tlie district court for Wright county for grand larceny in the second degree. The case was tried before Giddings, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict of guilty. From a judgment by which defendant was sentenced to be confined in the state reformatory, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree in the district court of Wright county, and sentenced to the state reformatory at St. Cloud. He appealed from' *429the judgment. He assigns thirty-three errors, but we shall consider only two of them.

The defendant was charged with having stolen on Monday, July 17, 1S99, from the dwelling house of Levi H. Webster his pocketbook which contained a ten-dollar bill and $3.75 in silver. That the larceny was committed by some one is unquestioned. The state called as a witness Mr. C. M. King, who testified that the day after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ThadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. State v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. State v. TownleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. State v. BinderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API