Henry Filters, Inc. v. Peabody Barnes, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Shekck, Judge.
This is an appeal from the order of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas disqualifying the law firm of Brooks and Kushman from representing appellant, Henry Filters, Inc. Because we find that substantial evidence supports the conclusion that appellant’s attorneys, Brooks and Kushman, had an existing attorney-client relationship with appellee when this litigation commenced, we affirm the order of the trial court.
Appellee, Peabody Barnes, Inc., f.k.a. Barnes Pump, is in the business of supplying motors and pumps for various uses. Appellant, Henry Filters, Inc., is in the business…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Brennan's, Inc. v. Brennan's Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- SST Castings, Inc. v. Amana Appliances, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Sayyah v. CutrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Lillback v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Davis v. MonteneryOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nilavar v. Mercy Health System-Western OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.