Legal Opinion

Davis v. Montenery

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2007No. Nos. 06 JE 48 and 06 JE 51PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vukovich, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Roger Davis Jr., appeals the decision of the Jefferson County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment for defendants-appellees Matilda Montenery, Mario Busack, Busack Realty, Michal Julian, Mark Thomas, and Thomas Law Offices, L.L.C. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly granted summary judgment to appellees. For the reasons stated below, the grant of summary judgment to Matilda Montenery, Mario Busack, Busack Realty, and Michal Julian is hereby affirmed. The grant of summary judgment to Mark Thomas and Thomas Law…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Delman v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. Zakel v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Darrah v. BaumbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Thackston v. ZembowerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Benedettini Cabinets, L.P. v. Sherwin-Williams CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API