Legal Opinion

Continental Nat. Bank v. Heilman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided June 5, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by the complainant against the widow and heirs of William Heilman, deceased, to charge them, as devisees and legatees under the last will of the decedent, with the amount of a promissory note for $100,000, alleged to have been executed by the decedent and David J. Mackey to the complainant. The note is as follows;

*37Maekey-Heilman Syndicate.

$100,000.

New York, April 10, 1889.

On demand the undersigned promise to pay to the Coni mental National Bank of New York or order, at their hanking house, one hundred thousand dollars, for value received, with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Board of Public Works v. Columbia CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hagan v. LantrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Continental Nat. Bank v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  3. Hampton Lumber Co. v. WardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1899
  4. General Electric Co. v. GillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Protection Strategies Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API