Arbuckle Mining & Milling Co. v. Beard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Murray County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by Wm. F.. Beard against the Arbuekle Mining & Milling Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff, .and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
Action was commenced in the trial court by Wm. F. Beard against the Arbuekle Mining & Milling Company, a corporation, and the Tahle-quah Mining & Development Company, a partnership, to cancel a mining lease, on account of the failure to prosecute development thereof, according to the terms prescribed therein. The answer was a general denial and justification by way of alleging a faithful compliance with the terms and conditions of the lease contract. A trial was had to the court and a finding made in favor of the plaintiff, and a decree entered canceling the lease and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. SlinkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Connelly v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Francis v. First Nat. Bank of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Patterson v. MeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Blue v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Vernor v. PoormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- McAlester - Edwards Coal Co. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Pauls Valley Compress & Storage Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.