Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 24, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Affirming on original and cross appeals.

In November, 1911, Claude Strange, an employe of tbe L. & N. Railroad, was killed in an accident, and shortly thereafter bis widow employed appellant, a practicing lawyer, to bring and prosecute an action for damages against the railroad company.

Tbe widow subsequently qualified as. administratrix, and thereafter appellant did institute such snit in tbe *332Logan circuit court, and on the trial in that court plaintiff was awarded a verdict for $15,000.00 damages, upon which judgment was entered. But the railroad…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Strange's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Newport Rolling Mill Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Proctor Coal Co. v. TyeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. McCallister's Administrator v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Louisville Railway Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wehr Constructors, Inc. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Wermeling v. WermelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Kudelle v. Vizzard Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Kalled v. AlbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. Wermeling v. WermelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API