Legal Opinion
Newport Rolling Mill Co. v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided March 16, 1912PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Carroll —
Affirming
In October, 1909, one Henry Starks1, as party of the first part, and Arthur C. Hali, an attorney at law, as party of the second part, entered into this contract:
“The party of the first part hereby employs party of the second part to prosecute and settle a claim for *599damages growing ont of personal injuries received by him on the 6th day of June, 1909, against the Newport Rolling Mill Company, of Newport, Ky.; said injuries ibeing the result of the negligence of the servants and agents of the said company, and which resulted in the loss of both…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Weller v. Jersey City, Hoboken & Paterson Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
- Potter v. Ajax Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
- Collins v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Lipscomb v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Denson v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Edleson v. EdlesonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Stratton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Kessler v. Jefferson Storage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Louisville Home Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.