Legal Opinion

Kalled v. Albee

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 11, 1998No. 95-817PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, j.

This case involves the issue of whether an attorney may enforce a fee-sharing agreement in a contingent fee case where that attorney loses his license to practice law prior to entry of judgment in the case. We hold that, under these circumstances, an attorney may not enforce the agreement.

The defendant, Pamela D. Albee, worked for the plaintiff, James J. Railed, in his law office as an associate attorney from 1983 to 1987. In 1987, Albee decided to leave Ralled’s employ and begin her own law practice. Railed notified clients that Albee was leaving the practice and gave them the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. KriseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Polland & Cook v. Lehmann, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Technical Aid Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Royden v. ArdoinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Tsiatsios v. TsiatsiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. Tamposi v. DenbyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  3. Danford v. Lowe's Companies IncDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API