Christy v. Springs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from ike District Couirt of Gandaian County; before G. F. Irwin, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OE EACTS. This is an action by MyTam S. Springs against Taylor P. Christy to quiet title to lots 8 and 9, in block 106, in the city of El Keno; trial and judgment for Springs; motion for a new trial overruled; Christy brings ease here by petition in error for review.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Beauchamp, J.:
The plaintiff alleges numerous errors, but, in his brief, argues only the fourth assignment: “That the decision is not sustained by the evidence, and is contrary to law.”
The facts as shown by the evidence are: That on the 27th day of October, 1893, Christy, plaintiff in error, obtained judgment against one T. F. McMeachan in the district court of Kingfisher county for the sum of $220 and costs, as shown by the judgment docket in the district clerk’s office for Kingfisher county; that the action, in which said judgment was obtained, was a replevin action;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglass v. NuzumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Clark v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Galbreath v. DroughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Pecotte v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 1886
- McDonald v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Morgan v. McGeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Lair v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Martin v. HostetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ashur v. McCreerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.