Legal Opinion

NBD-Sandusky Bank v. Ritter

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1989No. Docket 104868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Kelly, P.J.

Defendant-appellant John Deere Company appeals as of right from a judgment in favor of plaintiff NBD-Sandusky Bank. The trial court found that John Deere Company’s purchase money security interest in two pieces of farm equipment was not perfected within twenty days after the debtor received possession of the equipment, so it was subordinate to NBD’s prior perfected security interest in the same equipment under MCL 440.9312(5), (6); MSA 19.9312(5), (6).

In May of 1985, Sam and Emily Ritter entered into a security agreement granting NBD-Sandusky Bank a security interest in farm equipment owned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. Tri-City Motors & Sports, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Federal Land Bank of St Paul v. Bay Park Place, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NBD-Sandusky Bank v. RitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Valley Bank v. Estate of RainsdonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Michaels v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Michaels)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  4. NBD-Sandusky Bank v. RitterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API