Legal Opinion

NBD-Sandusky Bank v. Ritter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1991No. 87142, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

This appeal involves a dispute over the priority of conflicting security interests held by NBD-Sandusky Bank and John Deere Company in the same collateral. Resolution is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. MCL 440.1101 et seq.; MSA 19.1101 et seq.

The Court of Appeals held that John Deere’s purchase money security interest in certain farm equipment did not attach and therefore was not perfected until over twenty days after Sam Ritter, the debtor, took possession of the equipment. 179 Mich App 580; 446 NW2d 340 (1989). Thus, since John Deere’s perfected security interest failed to qualify…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. NBD-Sandusky Bank v. RitterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roan v. MurrayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Laborers Pension Trust Fund-Detroit & Vicinity v. Interior Exterior Specialists Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Nbd Bank, Na v. Timberjack, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Michaels v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Michaels)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Northeast Bank v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. (In Re T & R Flagg Logging Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API