Legal Opinion

Wah Shang Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1957No. 4886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Connell, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

This is an appeal from tbe judgment of tbe United States Customs Court, First Division, Abstract 59729, overruling tbe importer’s protest and sustaining tbe action of tbe collector in imposing a revenue tax of $9 per gallon on tbe merchandise bere involved under tbe provisions of section 2800 (a) of tbe Internal Revenue Code.

Tbe merchandise was invoiced as “Fu Kwat” and “Sum Yung.” It was classified by tbe collector under paragraph 24 of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shun Yuen Hing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Wing Yee Chong & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Arkopharma, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API