Legal Opinion

James Millar Co. v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1925PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is a petition for the assessment of damages caused by the taking of a coal wharf property on Plymouth Harbor, for the Commonwealth, by the Pilgrim Tercentenary Commission, on October 27, 1920, under Spec. St. 1919, c. 187. A jury found for the petitioner, and the case is before this court on the suggestion of the respondent that the court was without jurisdiction, and upon its exceptions taken to the admission of testimony.

The contention that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain suit against the Commonwealth rests upon the indisputable rule of law that the Commonwealth cannot be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Tigar v. Mystic River Bridge AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Maher v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Commonwealth v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API