Legal Opinion

Treen Motors Corp. v. Van Pelt

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion for judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

Plaintiff moves for judgment. This is predicated on the claim that the defendant is in default in pleading. The defendant served an answer which was returned. Later the defendant served another answer, which was likewise returned.

The question at the threshold of this motion is whether the defendant after her answer was returned should have moved to compel the plaintiff to accept it or whether she could wait until the plaintiff took judgment or applied for it and then raise her contention that the answer was proper in form and was served in time. It seems when an answer is returned on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fredericks v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Moran v. HelfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Williams v. Riel & GrangerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
  4. Duryea, Watts & Co. v. RaynerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Robinson v. Ecuador Development Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barthelmues v. IvesNew Rochelle City Court · 1948
  2. Curran v. PeglerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Gaffey v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Cook v. Freight Force, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Crimmins v. PolhemusCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API