Crimmins v. Polhemus
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtSkerritt, J.
This is a motion by defendant to compel the plaintiff, who filed a properly verified complaint in this conversion action, but served a copy with defective verification, to accept an unverified answer. The defective verification was in the usual form, dated and signed by a notary public, but omitted the plaintiff’s signature. The defendant, treating the complaint as unverified, served an unverified answer which was returned.
It appears'that the plaintiff, who is a lawyer, had no knowledge or notice of the defective verification until he received the notice of this motion. Within a few days…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Treen Motors Corp. v. Van PeltNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Moran v. HelfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Phonoharp Co. v. StobbeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1897
- Morris v. FowlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Beglin v. People's Trust Co.New York County Court, Kings County · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scaringe v. KinleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989