Legal Opinion

Curran v. Pegler

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.

The motion is to vacate a notice of examination in a libel case. The notice is in the general form as to all matters in issue. There are few points of practice on which there is a greater wealth of authority than this is not permissible in an action in defamation. Plaintiff does not currently contest this. He asks to have decision held in abeyance while a cross motion is decided. The motion is stated to be on the pleadings. Plaintiff seeks a clarification of what the pleadings are. It appears that the answer and amended answer are unverified. Plaintiff accepted the answer but returned the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Treen Motors Corp. v. Van PeltNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Fredericks v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. John Manners & Co. v. SohnenNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Brewster v. New York Evening Journal, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Travelers Insurance v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knight v. MaybeeNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Web Transmissions, Inc. v. Jetro Automatic Transmission, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API