Gray v. Callahan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG DR. MICHAEL A. GRAY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:24-cv-104 (GROH) MR. PETER CALLAHAN, Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Dr. Michael A. Gray’s Motion [ECF No. 2] for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.1 Because Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, the undersigned must conduct a preliminary review to determine whether Plaintiff’s complaint [ECF No. 1] sets forth any viable claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the…