Legal Opinion

Kinnonen v. Adolphson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1927No. 26,399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

When plaintiff rested, defendants’ motion for a directed verdict was granted. From the order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals.

The action is to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received about 11 o’clock at night by the negligent operation of an automobile truck in charge of defendant Adolphson, the servant of the other defendant, the owner, whereby plaintiff was struck down as he was crossing Seventh street at Hoag avenue in Minneapolis, Hoag avenue runs north and south where intersected by Seventh street which runs northwesterly and southeasterly. The former is 40 feet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rimmer v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Tobisch v. VillaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Johnson v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Chinander v. DelaittreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Allen v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heikkinen v. CashenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Kmetz v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Murray v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Bolster v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Plante v. PulaskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API