Legal Opinion

In re: Douglas Coley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2017No. 17-3071/3815PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court delivered a PER CURIAM order. MERRITT, J. (pp. 458-59), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

ORDER

In these combined appeals, Douglas Coley asks this court to remand his case to the district court or to grant him permission to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See 28 U.S.C. *457§ 2244(b)(3)(A). In either scenario, Coley hopes to argue that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. Florida, — U.S.—, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), renders Ohio’s death-penalty scheme unconstitutional. We DENY both requests.

In 1998, a jury convicted Coley of one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. In re WogenstahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Danny HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  4. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API