In re: Douglas Coley
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The court delivered a PER CURIAM order. MERRITT, J. (pp. 458-59), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
ORDER
In these combined appeals, Douglas Coley asks this court to remand his case to the district court or to grant him permission to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See 28 U.S.C. *457§ 2244(b)(3)(A). In either scenario, Coley hopes to argue that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. Florida, — U.S.—, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), renders Ohio’s death-penalty scheme unconstitutional. We DENY both requests.
In 1998, a jury convicted Coley of one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- In re WogenstahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Danny HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.