Legal Opinion

Towers v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2006No. SC S53591PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Petitioner seeks review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 18 (2008). See ORS 250.085(2) (specifying requirements for seeking review of certified ballot titles). This court reviews the certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with ORS 250.035(2). See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review).

Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution provides that either the legislature or the people, exercising the initiative power, may amend the constitution. It sets out both the terms on which they may amend the constitution and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. Department of Administrative ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Flanagan v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Terhune v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dixon / Frohnmayer v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Brady v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Honeyman v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Keisling v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API