Joel T. Cheatham, Inc. v. Hall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The sole issue is whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. We find that summary judgment was properly granted.
Upon motion a summary judgment must be rendered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The party moving for summary judgment has the burden of establishing the absence of any triable issue of fact. His…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Anthony Tile & Marble Co. v. H. L. Coble Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adaron Group, Inc. v. Industrial Innovators, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Egan v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Appalachian Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Town of BooneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Miriam Equities, LLC v. Lb-Ubs 2007-C2 Millstream Rd., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022
- Mohr Partners, Inc. v. Elior, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2025