Raymond v. Rockland Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Scire Facias upon a process of foreign attachment; brought before a justice of the peace and appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, of New London County, and there tried to the court, on the general issue, before Willey, J. The defendants were a joint stock manufacturing company, doing business in the town of Montville.
Read the full summary
Scire Facias upon a process of foreign attachment; brought before a justice of the peace and appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, of New London County, and there tried to the court, on the general issue, before Willey, J. The defendants were a joint stock manufacturing company, doing business in the town of Montville. The plaintiff brought his writ of attachment against one Ichabod Stoddard, to which a factorizing process was attached, in which the present defendents were described as the agents, factors, trustees, and debtors of Stoddard, the same being dated the 20th day of November,…
1Opinion of the CourtPark, J.
It is clear that the debt due from the defendants to Stoddard was never attached by the plaintiff in his suit against Stoddard. The plaintiff concedes this, but he claims, that the defendants waived the defect in the attachment, and should now be estopped to claim that the debt was not attached. There would be force in this claim if the suit was *406between the parties themselves, and concerning a matter in which they only were interested. But the debt attempted to be attached belonged to Stoddard. It was his property, and the plaintiff attempted to take it by process of law, against his will and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. RootsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Price v. Boot ShopOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Altona v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Nelson v. SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.